Teorías de liderazgo en organizaciones: Clasificación paradigmática y oportunidades de investigación Paradigmatic classification and research opportunities

Main Article Content

Daniel Arturo Cernas Ortiz http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-1968
Patricia Mercado Salgado http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-3139

Resumen

Se analizan y discuten las teorías tradicionales y alternativas de liderazgo en organizaciones, a partir de una revisión de la literatura que abarca los principales enfoques utilizados en la investigación contemporánea. El análisis considera las suposiciones subyacentes sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia social y de la sociedad de dichas teorías. Para obtener los resultados, la literatura se categoriza en forma inédita y ex post facto en la matriz de cuatro cuadrantes de Burrell y Morgan. Se concluye que la mayoría de la investigación en el tema es funcionalista de corte pragmático y que, de las teorías de los rasgos a la psicología evolucionista, se requiere mayor pluralidad de conocimiento para promover organizaciones, personas y, consecuentemente, sociedades más efectivas.

Article Details

Como citar
CERNAS ORTIZ, Daniel Arturo; MERCADO SALGADO, Patricia. Teorías de liderazgo en organizaciones: Clasificación paradigmática y oportunidades de investigación. CIENCIA ergo-sum, [S.l.], v. 30, n. 3, oct. 2022. ISSN 2395-8782. Disponible en: <https://cienciaergosum.uaemex.mx/article/view/17609>. Fecha de acceso: 29 nov. 2022
Sección
Espacio del divulgador

Citas

Agarwal, A. y Sandiford, J. (2021). Fictionalizing dialogue: Interpretative phenomenological analysis in organizational research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16 (1), 218-236. doi.org/10.1108/qrom-01-2020-1885
Alvesson, M. y Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. Leadership Quarterly, 30 (4), 383-395. doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.04.001
Ayman, R., Chemers, M. y Fiedler, F. (1995). The contingency model of leadership effectiveness: Its level of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 6 (2), 147-167. doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90032-2
Bass, B. y Avolio, B. (1995). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, Leader Form, Rater Form, and Scoring. Palo Alto, California (EE.UU): Mind Garden.
Burrell, G. y Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London, UK: Ashgate Publishing Company.
Callaghan, C.W. (2016). Critical theory and contemporary paradigm differentiation. Acta Commercii, 16 (2), 59-99. doi.org/10.4102/ac.v16i2.421
Céspedes, E. (2021). A positivist criticism of positivist growth theory. Cinta de Moebio, 72, 215-233. doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2021000300215
Dasborough, M., Ashkanasy, N., Humphrey, R., Harms, P., Credé, M. y Wood, D. (en prensa). Does leadership still not need emotional intelligence? Continuing the great EI debate. Leadership Quarterly. doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101539
Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7 (2), 191-207. doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.2.191
Frost, P. (1980). Toward a radical framework for practicing organization science. Academy of Management Review, 5 (4), 501-507. doi.org/10.2307/257454
Gioia, D. y Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15 (4), 584-602. doi.org/10.2307/258683
Hammer, E. (1990). On the paradigmatic fit of alienation: Some comments on the Burrell and Morgan scheme. International Review of Modern Sociology, 20 (1), 143-161.
Kairiuki, J. (2020). The effect of self-efficacy on leader-member exchange (LMX) formation in leadership effectiveness. International Leadership Journal, 12 (3), 16-37.

Khun, T. (1962). La Estructura de las Revoluciones Científicas. Chicago, Illinois (EE.UU.): Chicago University Press.
Kroon, B., van Woerkom M. y Menting, C. (2017). Mindfulness as substitute for leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32 (4), 284-297. doi.org/10.1108/jmp-07-2016-0223
Kuada, J. (2009). Paradigms in International Business Research (working paper no. 53). Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242563189_Paradigms_in_International_Business_Research_-_Classifications_and_Applications
Kuwabara, K., Yu, S., Lee, A. y Galinsky, A. (2016). Status decreases dominance in the West but increases dominance in the East. Psychological Science, 27 (2), 127-137. doi.org/10.1177/0956797615612694
Lee, L. y Fiore, R. (2020). Measuring levels of fundamental attribution error ascribed to leadership of entrepreneurial organizations across national cultures. Journal of Business Strategies, 37 (1), 28-56. doi.org/10.54155/jbs.37.1.1-28
Li, M. (2018). What Have We Learned from the 100-Year History of Leadership Research? (Part II). Disponible en: https://fisher.osu.edu/blogs/leadreadtoday/blog/what-have-we-learned-from-the-100-year-history-of-leadership-research-part-ii
Mabey, C. (2013). Leadership development in organizations: Multiple discourses and diverse practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 359-380. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00344.x
Meindl, J., Ehrlich, S. y Dukerich, J. (1995). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78-102. doi.org/10.2307/2392813
Miller, J.T. (2020). The ontology of words: Realism, nominalism, and eliminativism. Philosophy Compass, 15, 1-13. doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12691
Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25 (4), 605-622. doi.org/10.2307/2392283
Nicholson, N. (1997). Evolutionary psychology: Toward a new view of human nature and organizational society. Human Relations, 50 (9), 1053-1078. doi.org/10.1177/001872679705000901
Parker, M. (1992). Post-modern organizations or post-modern organization theory? Organization Studies, 13 (1), 1-17. doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300103
Peiró, J., Bayona, J., Caballer, A. y Di Fabio, A. (2020). Importance of work characteristics affects job performance: The mediating role of individual dispositions on the work design-performance relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 1-10. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109808
Pfeffer, J. (1997). The ambiguity of leadership. Academy of Management Review, 2, 104-112. doi.org/10.2307/257611
Re, D., DeBruine, L., Jones, B. y Perrett, D. (2013). Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts. Evolutionary Psychology, 11 (1), 89-103. doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100109
Robbins, S. y Judge, T. (2017). Organizational Behavior. New York, NY (EE.UU.): Prentice Hall.
Saleem, A., Wu, L., Aslam, S. y Zhang, T. (2021). Spotlight on path-goal leadership theory silos in practice to improve and sustain job-oriented development: Evidence from education sector. Sustainability, 13, 1-20. doi.org/10.3390/su132112324
Sánchez, C. y Lehnert, K. (2019). The unbearable heaviness of leadership: The effects of competency, negatives, and experience on women`s aspirations to leadership. Journal of Business Research, 95, 192-194. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.033
Schultze, U. y Stabell, C. (2004). Knowing what you don´t know? Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research. Journal of Management Studies, 41 (4), 549-573. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00444.x

Schyns, B., Kiefer, T. y Foti, R. (2020). Does thinking of myself as leader make me want to lead? The role of congruence in self-theories and implicit leadership theories in motivation to lead. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 122, 1-16. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103477
Schyns, B. y Riggio, R. (2016). Implicit leadership theories. En A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 20-30). Berlín, Alemania: Springer.
Tooze, J.G. (2015). Consultancy Companies Analysis; Leadership Success. Disponible en: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/97987/Consultancy+companies+analysis.pdf?sequence=1
Turner, J. (2007). Ideographic versus nomothetic explanation: A comment on Porpora´s conclusion. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 13 (3), 273-280. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1983.tb00478.x
Waldman, D., Bass, B. y Yammarino, F. (2000). Adding to contingent-reward behavior: The augmenting effect of charismatic leadership. Group and Organizational Studies, 15 (4), 381-394. doi.org/10.21236/ada204115
Welch, C., Plakoyiannaki, E., Piekkari, R., Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2013). Legitimizing diverse uses for qualitative research: A rhetorical analysis of two management journals. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 245-264. doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12001
Western, S. (2008). Leadership. A Critical Text. Thousand Oaks, California (EE.UU.): SAGE.
Yuval, K. y Gil, L. (2021). Traits and time in leadership emergence: A longitudinal study. Leadership Quarterly, 32 (2), 1-25. doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101443
Zhu, J., Jiwen Song, L., Zhu, L. y Johnson, R. (2019). Visualizing the landscape and evolution of leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 30, 215-232. doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.06.003