Compartir datos de investigación: reflexiones desde el ethos de la ciencia de Robert K. Merton

Main Article Content

Omar Díaz Fragoso
Gabriela María Luisa Riquelme Alcantar
Gibrán Rivera González


Se analiza el interés de los científicos en compartir datos de investigación con base en el ethos de la ciencia de Robert K. Merton. Se revisaron treinta documentos científicos, resultado de búsquedas en bases de datos como Scopus y Web of Science; el análisis interpretativo del contenido se realizó con el programa ATLAS.ti. Entre los hallazgos destacan diversos factores asociados a la negación de los científicos para compartir datos en la ciencia. Asimismo, se encontraron otros posicionamientos que promueven una concientización a favor de distribuirlos, pues el bien común está por encima de los intereses particulares. Finalmente, se constata que el ethos es una propuesta apropiada para examinar el interés de los investigadores en la distribución de datos de investigación. 

Article Details

Como citar
DÍAZ FRAGOSO, Omar; RIQUELME ALCANTAR, Gabriela María Luisa; RIVERA GONZÁLEZ, Gibrán. Compartir datos de investigación: reflexiones desde el ethos de la ciencia de Robert K. Merton. CIENCIA ergo-sum, [S.l.], v. 29, n. 1, feb. 2022. ISSN 2395-8782. Disponible en: <>. Fecha de acceso: 20 mayo 2022 doi:
Ciencias sociales


Andreoli-Versbach, P., & Mueller-Langer, F. (2014). Open access to data: An ideal professed but not practised. Research Policy, 43(9), 1621-1633.

Bisol, G. D., Anagnostou, P., Capocasa, M., Bencivelli, S., Cerroni, A., Contreras, J., & … Boulton, G. (2014). Perspectives on open science and scientific data sharing: An interdisciplinary workshop. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 92(2014), 179-200.

Borgman, C. L. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059-1078.

Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge: MIT press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Bray, D., & von Storch, H. (2017). The normative orientations of climate scientists. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(5), 13511367.

Brown, P. O., Cabell, D., Chakravarti, A., Cohen, B., Delamothe, T., Eisen, M., & … Johnson, R. K. (2003). Bethesda statement on open access publishing.

Buenrostro, E. (2017). La generación de valor a partir de los datos abiertos de gobierno. Disponible en

Bullinger, H.-J., Einhäupl, K. M., Gaehtgens, P., Gruss, P., Henkel, H.-O., Kröll, W., … Galluzzi, P. (2003). Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities. Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, 20-22.

Chan, L., Cuplinkas, D., Eisen, M., Friend, F., Genova, Y., Guédon, J.-C., & … Velterop, J. (2002). Budapest Open Access Initiative. Disponible en

Childs, S., McLeod, J., Lomas, E., & Cook, G. (2014). Opening research data: Issues and opportunities. Records Management Journal, 24(2), 142-162.

Choudhury, S., Fishman, J. R., McGowan, M. L., & Juengst, E. T. (2014). Big data, open science and the brain: Lessons learned from genomics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1-10.

Cooper, M. (2007). Sharing data and results in ethnographic research: Why this should not be an ethical imperative. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(1), 3-19.

Costello, M. J. (2009). Motivating online publication of data. BioScience, 59(5), 418-427.

Cragin, M. H., Palmer, C. L., Carlson, J. R., & Witt, M. (2010). Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1926), 4023-4038.

DFO. (2013). Policy for Scientific Data. Retrieved from

ERC. (2017). Guidelines on implementation of open access to scientific publications and research data in projects supported by the european research council under horizon 2020. Retrieved from

Fecher, B., Friesike, S., & Hebing, M. (2015). What drives academic data sharing? PLOS ONE, 10(2), e0118053.

Hampton, S. E., Anderson, S. S., Bagby, S. C., Gries, C., Han, X., Hart, E. M., & … Zimmerman, N. (2015). The Tao of open science for ecology. Ecosphere, 6(7),

Harper, L. M., & Kim, Y. (2018). Attitudinal, normative, and resource factors affecting psychologists’ intentions to adopt an open data badge: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 41(2018), 23-32.

HEFCE, RCUK, Universities UK (UUK), & Wellcome. (2016). Concordat On Open Research Data. Retrieved from

Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268.

Kim, S. Y., & Kim, Y. (2018). The ethos of science and its correlates: An empirical analysis of scientists’ endorsement of Mertonian norms. Science, Technology and Society, 23(1), 1-24.

Krishna, V. V. (2014). Changing social relations between science and society: Contemporary challenges. Science, Technology and Society, 19(2), 133-159.

Kuipers, T., & Van Der Hoeven, J. (2009). PARSE . Insight Insight into digital preservation of research output in Europe. Retrieved from

Ley de ciencia y tecnología (2015). Ciudad de México: Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión.

Link, G. J., Lumbard, K., Conboy, K., Feldman, M., & Feller, J. (2017). Contemporary issues of open data in information systems research: Considerations and recommendations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 41, 587-610.

Lowndes, J. S. S., Best, B. D., Scarborough, C., Afflerbach, J. C., Frazier, M. R., O’Hara, C. C., &… Halpern, B. S. (2017). Our path to better science in less time using open data science tools. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1(6).

Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, universalism and disinterestedness: Re-examining contemporary support among academics for Merton’s scientific norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67-78.

McKiernan, E. C., Bourne, P. E., Brown, C. T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., & … Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife, 5, 1-19.

Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Murray-Rust, P., Neylon, C., Pollock, R., & Wilbanks, J. (2010). Panton principles, principles for open data in science. Panton Principles.

Nguyen, V. M., Brooks, J. L., Young, N., Lennox, R. J., Haddaway, N., Whoriskey, F. G., &… Cooke, S. J. (2017). To share or not to share in the emerging era of big data: Perspectives from fish telemetry researchers on data sharing.
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 74(8), 1260-1274.

NIH. (2003). NIH data sharing policy and implementation guidance. Retrieved from

NSF. (2013). Open Data at NSF. Retrieved from

OECD. (2007). OECD Principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding.

Olivé, L. (2007). La ciencia y la tecnología en la sociedad del conocimiento. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Ontiveros, M. (2016). Datos abiertos de investigación. Caso México. Ciudad de México: Conacyt.

Pampel, H., & Dallmeier-Tiessen, S. (2014). Open research data: From vision to practice. In S. Friesike & S. Bartling (eds.), Opening science the evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing (pp. 213-224). Cham: Springer Open.

Pfenninger, S., DeCarolis, J., Hirth, L., Quoilin, S., & Staffell, I. (2017). The importance of open data and software: Is energy research lagging behind? Energy Policy, 101, 211-215.

Pitt, M. A., & Tang, Y. (2013). What should be the data sharing policy of cognitive science? Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(1), 214-221.

Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510-1517.

Rutjens, B. T., Heine, S. J., Sutton, R. M., & van Harreveld, F. (2018). Attitudes towards science. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 125-165.

Sayogo, D. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2013). Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S19-S31.

Sedransk, N., Young, L. J., Kelner, K. L., Moffitt, R. A., Thakar, A., Raddick, J., & … Spiegelman, C. (2010). Make research data public?-Not Always so Simple: A dialogue for statisticians and science editors. Statistical Science, 25(1), 41-50.

Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Smith, K. N., & Makel, M. C. (2019). Open science: A candid conversation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(2), 111-123.

Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., &… Frame, M. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLOS ONE, 6(6), e21101.

Vinck, D. (2014). Ciencias y sociedad. Sociología del trabajo científico. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.

Wallis, J. C., Rolando, E., & Borgman, C. L. (2013). If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PLOS ONE, 8(7), e67332.

Wicherts, J. M. (2011). Psychology must learn a lesson from fraud case. Nature, 480(7375), 7.

Wiley, C., & Mischo, W. H. (2016). Data management practices and perspectives of atmospheric scientists and engineering faculty. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 85, 1-7.

Zuiderwijk, A., & Spiers, H. (2019). Sharing and re-using open data: A case study of motivations in astrophysics. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 228-241.